*Three head-to-head phase III trials were carried out in plaque psoriasis. These were independent to the phase III trials carried out in PsA and axSpA, which included entirely separate patient populations. No head-to-head trials have been carried out with BIMZELX in patients with PsA or axSpA. Superior skin clearance was demonstrated across the phase III studies BE SURE (BIMZELX vs adalimumab, co-primary endpoints of PASI 90 and IGA 0/1 at Week 16), BE RADIANT (BIMZELX vs secukinumab, primary endpoint of PASI 100 at Week 16) and BE VIVID (BIMZELX vs ustekinumab, co-primary endpoints of PASI 90 and IGA 0/1 at Week 16).5–7 BE SURE: BIMZELX vs adalimumab at week 16, 86 % (n = 275/319) vs 47 % (n = 75/159) achieved PASI 90, respectively (p < 0.001), and 61 % (n = 194/319) vs 24 % (n = 38/159) achieved PASI 100, respectively (p < 0.001).6 BE RADIANT: BIMZELX vs secukinumab at week 16, 86 % (n = 319/373) vs 74 % (n = 275/370) achieved PASI90, respectively (p = not calculated) and 62 % (n = 230/373) vs 49 % (n = 181/370) achieved PASI 100, respectively (p < 0.001).7 BE VIVID: BIMZELX vs ustekinumab vs placebo at week 16, 85 % (n = 273/321) vs 50 % (n = 81/163) vs 5 % (n = 4/83) achieved PASI 90 respectively (p < 0.0001 vs ustekinumab and p < 0.0001 vs placebo) and 59 % (n = 188/321) vs 21 % (n = 34/163) vs 0 % (n = 0/83) achieved PASI 100 respectively (p < 0.0001 vs ustekinumab and p < 0.0001 vs placebo).5
**In PsA, ACR 50 at Week 16 (primary endpoint) was achieved by 44 % (n = 189/431) with BIMZELX, vs 10 % (n = 28/281) with placebo, of biologic-naïve patients in BE OPTIMAL (p < 0.0001) and 43 %(n = 116/267) with BIMZELX, vs 7 % (n = 9/133) with placebo (p < 0.0001), of TNFi-IR patients in BE COMPLETE (NRI analysis); PASI 90 and PASI 100 at Week 16 were achieved by 61 % (n = 133/217) with BIMZELX (vs 3 % [n = 4/140] with placebo (p < 0.0001)) and 47 %(n = 103/127) with BIMZELX (vs 2 % [n = 3/140] with placebo (p < 0.001)) of biologic-naive patients, respectively, in BE OPTIMAL, and 69 % (n = 121/176) with BIMZELX (vs 7 % [n = 6/88] with placebo (p < 0.0001)) and 59 % (n = 103/176) with BIMZELX (vs 5 % [n = 4/88] with placebo (p < 0.001) of TNF-IR patients, respectively, in BE COMPLETE (NRI analysis); MDA at Week 16 was achieved by 45 % (n = 194/431) of biologic-naïve patients with BIMZELX (vs 13 % [n = 37/281] with placebo (p < 0.0001)) in BE OPTIMAL and 44 % (n = 118/267) of TNFi-IR patients with BIMZELX (vs 6 % [n = 8/133] with placebo (p < 0.0001) in BE COMPLETE (NRI analysis).3,8
†In axSpA, ASAS 40 at Week 16 (primary endpoint) was achieved by 48 % (n = 61/128) with BIMZELX, vs 21 % (n = 27/126) with placebo (p < 0.001), of nr-axSpA patients inBE MOBILE 1, and 45 % (n = 99/221) with BIMZELX, vs 23 % (n = 23/111) with placebo (p < 0.001), of AS patients in BE MOBILE 2 (NRI analysis); ASDAS-LDA at Week 16 was achieved by 46 % (n = 59/128) of nr-axSpA patients with BIMZELX (vs 21 % [n = 26/126) with placebo(p < 0.0001)) in BE MOBILE 1 and 45 % (n = 99/221) of AS patients with BIMZELX (vs 18 % [n = 19/111] with placebo (p < 0.0001)) in BE MOBILE 2 (MI analysis).4
‡Meaningful efficacy across key domains and manifestations in PsA is defined by the achievement of high-level efficacy in joints (ACR 50), skin (PASI 100), minimal disease activity and complete resolution of enthesitis and dactyltis (achieved by 50 % and 76 % at Week 16, respectively, of biologic-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with BIMZELX [pooled data, vs 35 % and 51 %, respectively, with placebo (p = 0.0083 and p = 0.0022) (NRI analysis).8
§Meaningful efficacy across key domains and manifestations of the full axSpA spectrum is defined by the achievement of high-level efficacy in core symptoms (ASAS 40), disease activity (ASDAS-LDA), and complete resolution of enthesitis (achieved by 51 % of nr-axSpA patients and 52 % of AS patients with BIMZELX at Week 16, vs 24 % and 33 %, respectively, with placebo (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006); NRI analysis.4,9